🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.